CVE-2026-1525CRITICAL 9.8EPSS p38.4%

CVE-2026-1525CVE-2026-1525

Description

Undici allows duplicate HTTP Content-Length headers when they are provided in an array with case-variant names (e.g., Content-Length and content-length). This produces malformed HTTP/1.1 requests with multiple conflicting Content-Length values on the wire. Who is impacted: * Applications using undici.request(), undici.Client, or similar low-level APIs with headers passed as flat arrays * Applications that accept user-controlled header names without case-normalization Potential consequences: * Denial of Service: Strict HTTP parsers (proxies, servers) will reject requests with duplicate Content-Length headers (400 Bad Request) * HTTP Request Smuggling: In deployments where an intermediary and backend interpret duplicate headers inconsistently (e.g., one uses the first value, the other uses the last), this can enable request smuggling attacks leading to ACL bypass, cache poisoning, or credential hijacking

Scoring

CVSS 3.19.8 (CRITICAL)
VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS0.49% probability of exploitation · percentile 38.4% · 2026-06-18T12:00:27Z
Published2026-03-12
Last modified2026-03-19

Underlying weaknesses· 1

CWE-444

References

  1. https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html
  2. https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/444.html
  3. https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-2mjp-6q6p-2qxm
  4. https://hackerone.com/reports/3556037
  5. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-8.6

1

TypeTargetConfidenceTier
WeaknessInconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')cwe-4440%live

Related by meaning· 6

Nearest entities by semantic similarity across the cs-graph corpus.

CVE
CVE-2026-28368
CVE
CVE-2026-42581
CVE
CVE-2025-12642
CVE
CVE-2026-23527
CVE
CVE-2026-23941
CVE
CVE-2025-14523
Sourced from NVD + FIRST.org EPSS. Curated for EU compliance use cases by Adam Lundqvist, Founder at SQUR.