TIBER_EUTesting Phasevoice-validated

TIBER_EU Testing: Testing Phase

TIBER_EU

AL
Adam Lundqvist
Founder at SQUR · last verified 2026-10-06

Regulation text

The testing phase comprises threat intelligence (TI) and red team (RT) work. TI providers produce a Targeted Threat Intelligence Report scoping plausible adversary scenarios. RT providers then execute realistic attack scenarios against live production systems supporting critical functions, with strict no-harm rules and clear escalation/abort paths to the test manager.

ATT&CK techniques this article tests · 0

TechniqueWhy it mapsConfidence

Defending mitigations · 0

MitigationWhat it doesConfidence

Underlying weaknesses · 7

CWEWhy it persistsConfidence
CWE-2871. Improper authentication is a common vulnerability exploited in 'realistic attack scenarios' by red teams. 2. This weakness allows unauthorized access, a primary goal of simulated attacks.
90%
CWE-2691. Improper privilege management is a key weakness that red team (RT) exercises aim to uncover. 2. This allows adversaries to escalate privileges, as simulated in 'realistic attack scenarios'.
90%
CWE-2001. Exposure of sensitive information is a direct outcome of successful red team (RT) discovery and collection activities. 2. This weakness is a target for 'plausible adversary scenarios'.
80%
CWE-7981. Use of hard-coded credentials is a frequent finding in red team (RT) engagements, providing easy access for 'realistic attack scenarios'. 2. This weakness bypasses standard authentication controls.
80%
CWE-781. Improper neutralization of OS command injection is a critical vulnerability that red teams exploit for execution. 2. This weakness enables remote code execution in 'realistic attack scenarios'.
70%
CWE-4341. Unrestricted file upload with dangerous types can lead to initial compromise in 'realistic attack scenarios'. 2. This weakness allows red teams to introduce malicious code.
70%
CWE-6111. Improper restriction of XML External Entity (XXE) references is a vulnerability red teams exploit. 2. This weakness can lead to information disclosure or server-side request forgery in 'realistic attack scenarios'.
70%

What SQUR Covers

Web application + API pentesting for OWASP Top 10, business logic flaws, authentication bypass, injection attacks, and other application-layer vulnerabilities. €1,995 per scan, 24-hour turnaround, EU-only data.

What SQUR Does Not Cover

Internal network pentesting, endpoint security testing, physical security assessments, social engineering, or ICT third-party concentration risk reviews. Engage a complementary provider for those scope items.

Provenance

Mapped Q2.2026 using gemini-2.5-flash · €0.0192 compute · voice-rubric self-validated