TIBER_EUTIBER-EU Generic Frameworkvoice-validated
TIBER_EU Generic: TIBER-EU Generic Framework
TIBER_EU
AL
Founder at SQUR · last verified 2026-10-06
Regulation text
TIBER-EU is the European framework for threat intelligence-based ethical red-teaming. It enables financial sector entities to test their cyber resilience by simulating real-life attacks. The framework prescribes the engagement of qualified threat intelligence providers and red team providers, defines the phases (preparation, testing, closure), and aligns with DORA Article 25 advanced testing requirements.
ATT&CK techniques this article tests · 0
| Technique | Why it maps | Confidence |
|---|
Defending mitigations · 7
| Mitigation | What it does | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| M1047 | 1. Robust auditing and logging are essential for detecting and responding to simulated attacks, a core TIBER-EU requirement for post-incident analysis and improvement. | 95% |
| M1031 | 2. Network segmentation limits lateral movement, a key defense tested by TIBER-EU's advanced attack simulations to contain breaches. | 90% |
| M1030 | 3. Network intrusion prevention systems detect and block malicious traffic, crucial for TIBER-EU's assessment of perimeter and internal defenses. | 85% |
| M1035 | 4. Multi-factor authentication prevents credential compromise, a primary target in TIBER-EU red-teaming scenarios to secure access. | 90% |
| M1028 | 5. Secure operating system configurations harden systems against exploitation, a foundational element tested by TIBER-EU for system resilience. | 85% |
| M1017 | 6. Effective user account management controls access and privileges, directly mitigating privilege escalation and persistence techniques in TIBER-EU. | 80% |
| M1050 | 7. Regular vulnerability scanning identifies weaknesses proactively, informing the scope and effectiveness of TIBER-EU testing by addressing known flaws. | 75% |
Underlying weaknesses · 7
| CWE | Why it persists | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| CWE-79 | 1. XSS vulnerabilities are common initial access vectors, directly exploited in TIBER-EU simulations to test web application security and user interaction defenses. | 85% |
| CWE-287 | 2. Weak authentication mechanisms are prime targets for TIBER-EU red teams, leading to unauthorized access and system compromise, assessing identity controls. | 90% |
| CWE-200 | 3. Unintended information exposure facilitates discovery and exfiltration, a critical vulnerability assessed by TIBER-EU to evaluate data protection and leakage prevention. | 80% |
| CWE-78 | 4. Command injection allows attackers to execute arbitrary code, a severe weakness exploited in TIBER-EU to test system integrity and input validation. | 85% |
| CWE-269 | 5. Flawed privilege management enables privilege escalation, a key objective for TIBER-EU red teams to demonstrate impact and assess least privilege enforcement. | 90% |
| CWE-502 | 6. Deserialization vulnerabilities lead to remote code execution, a high-impact weakness often targeted in TIBER-EU advanced testing to assess application security. | 75% |
| CWE-306 | 7. Lack of authentication on critical functions allows direct access, a significant flaw TIBER-EU red teams exploit to bypass controls and test access management. | 80% |
What SQUR Covers
Web application + API pentesting for OWASP Top 10, business logic flaws, authentication bypass, injection attacks, and other application-layer vulnerabilities. €1,995 per scan, 24-hour turnaround, EU-only data.
What SQUR Does Not Cover
Internal network pentesting, endpoint security testing, physical security assessments, social engineering, or ICT third-party concentration risk reviews. Engage a complementary provider for those scope items.
Provenance
Mapped Q2.2026 using gemini-2.5-flash · €0.0181 compute · voice-rubric self-validated